LGBTQ+ History in Colorado Resource Set

Overview

Title: LGBTQ+ History 

Theme/Focus: Significant places in queer history in CO, oral histories, historical empathy

Location(s): Denver, Fort Collins, 

Essential/Inquiry Question(s): Using Queer history as a case study, how has true history been divorced from popular narratives of progress? What do historical narratives look like with and without Queer stories?

*Images may be downloaded and will save in the highest resolution available from History Matters. 

Author

Morgan Peters 

The Mattachine Society's 6th Annual Convention program, 1959.
The Mattachine Society's 6th Annual Convention Program, Denver, 1959.

Historical Context/Background

From 1900 to 1950, LGBTQ+ individuals in Northern Colorado lived largely under the radar, as homosexuality and gender nonconformity were criminalized and considered taboo. Social norms and legal restrictions forced queer people into secrecy, with few safe spaces for expression. In cities like Fort Collins and Greeley, queer communities were extremely difficult, if at all possible, to find. Further, LGBTQ+ individuals often faced discrimination and legal consequences. Despite this, queer communities began to form in the shadows, navigating a world that offered little acceptance. This inquiry lesson explores the hidden histories of LGBTQ+ individuals in Northern Colorado during a time of repression and marginalization. 

In Denver specifically, the police routinely harassed and arrested gay men under state and then city ordinances. This coincided with the Lavender Scare, which was a moral panic about sexuality. In the 1950s, Colorado passed a “psychopathic offender law” that made being queer illegal. This law was overturned by the Supreme Court in 1967 with Specht V. Patterson, because the law violated the 14th Amendment by not giving those arrested due process. In light of the law being overturned, the City of Denver passed an ordinance that outlawed crossdressing, lewd behavior, and soliciting in very vague terms. This ordinance was used to target and harass gay men until 1973. The Denver Police used these ordinances to entrap and arrest gay men on the basis of conversation until the Gay Coalition of Denver sued the city council. This led to the GCD and other members of the queer community being allowed to speak their concerns at a meeting on October 23rd, 1973. The meeting ran for several hours as gay men spoke about the harm of the public expression laws and police targeting they experienced. Shortly after the meeting, the ordinance was dissolved, ending a long history of police violence toward the gay community in Denver.  

Between the years of 1990 and 2014, the queer community in Colorado experienced a wide range of advancements and setbacks. In 1990, Denver adopted an anti-discrimination policy against gays and lesbians, becoming one of the first cities in the country to specifically codify a law protecting members of the LGBTQ+ community from harm. In response, conservative groups rallied to create and propose Amendment 2, a bill making anti-discrimination laws illegal at the state level. Amendment 2 passed during the 1992 elections, becoming law in 1993. The amendment passed by a 53-47 margin. 

The passage of Amendment 2 exacerbated homophobia in the state. Denver’s Tattered Cover Book Store faced a bomb threat in 1993 simply for employing openly gay individuals. The Ku Klux Klan began distributing anti-gay literature in cities like Aspen, which had also joined Denver in passing anti-discrimination laws in 1990, and high school students in Fort Collins noted an increase in outward homophobia at their schools. In the March edition of The Public Eye, the feelings of Colorado’s queer community were articulated: 

“An eerie unease hangs in the air in Colorado. For lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals, nagging questions pervade everyday life: Did the kindly person who just gave me her parking place vote for Amendment 2? Did my landlord vote for the amendment, knowing that I am gay? Will gay rights be pushed back to the days before Stonewall? Who or what is behind this hate?”

Nationwide backlash against Amendment 2 was swift. Colorado faced boycotts by the entertainment industry and from nationwide LGBTQ+ groups. In 1996, the United States Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision, deeming Amendment 2 unconstitutional. This was a major victory for gay rights nationwide, as it protected antidiscrimination laws under the Fourteenth Amendment.

In 2001, in the wake of the murder of Matthew Shepard, Colorado passed a hate crimes law that protected both sexual identity and gender expression. Shepard, a gay man and resident of Laramie, Wyoming, was brutally beaten and left to die on a fence post outside Laramie. He was airlifted to Fort Collins, Colorado, where he died in a local hospital. 

The 2000s saw a general shift to the right in both local and national politics. In 2006, another amendment was added to the Colorado constitution which set back gay rights. Amendment 43, which defined marriage as between a man and a woman, passed with a 56-44 margin. However, following Amendment 43’s passage, a slew of new legislation worked to expand rights and protections for LGBTQ+ citizens. Between 2007 and 2008, laws were passed that allowed gay couples to adopt children, protected transgender Coloradans from employment discrimination, and expanded housing protections. In 2009, the Designated Beneficiaries Act allowed same-sex couples the benefit of insurance, inheritance, hospital visitations, funeral arrangements, death benefits, and other important legal matters.

In 2014, the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down marriage bans in both Utah and Oklahoma, setting the stage for Colorado’s Circuit Court of Appeals to declare Colorado’s ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. Gay marriage has been legally recognized in Colorado since October 7, 2014. 

Resources

Kittredge Building

Queer Spaces in Denver 1870-1980

Description: This building holds some of the earliest Queer history in Colorado. After the San Francisco Fire in 1906, Mary Sperry and Gail Laughlin moved to Denver. Mary and Gail were in a romantic relationship when they moved. Historian Wendy Rouse describes the couple’s relationship as an “open secret.” The women were prominent suffragists and activists for women’s rights.  Both women also had well-established careers, one as a lawyer and the other as a doctor. Both had their offices kept together in the Kitteredge Building, at 511 16th St.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • What does this image say about hidden histories? 
  • If you hadn’t known the queer history attached, you would’ve just seen this as another ordinary building. What does this suggest about larger themes we’ve discussed about hidden histories and the stories historians choose to tell? 
  • How are queer histories ‘hidden in plain sight?
  • How were Queer equality movements interwoven with other equality efforts, such as women’s suffrage?

Significance: This source is significant because it represents the intersection of early women’s suffrage movements with the queer movements and illustrates how the people producing these movements often found themselves occupying multiple identities. 

The elaborate facade of the Kittredge Building, formerly at 511 16th St. in Denver.
Kittredge Building, formerly at 511 16th St., Denver, CO.

The Snake Pit

Queer Spaces in Denver 1870-1980

Description: After World War II, public concern over homosexuality further forced Queer communities into secret spaces, creating the first “gay bars.” By many accounts, the first gay bar in Denver, Colorado, was the “Snake Pit.” This bar is believed to have been in the basement of The Steak Bar at 17th and Glenarm Place. Historian Katie Gilmartin conducted oral histories that described the “Pit” as a “dingy, small bar with an entrance to the back of the restaurant”. Lesbians and gay men would sometimes choose to get private rooms at nearby hotels like the Albany and Brown Palace. 

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • Less than a year after the Stonewall Uprising, police raided the Snake Pit bar in New York. What do you think were the intentions in naming this Denver queer space Snake Pit?
  • If you hadn’t known the queer history attached, you would’ve just seen this as another ordinary building. What does this suggest about larger themes we’ve discussed about hidden histories and the stories historians choose to tell? 
  • How are queer histories ‘hidden in plain sight?

Significance: This source is significant because it represents the “hidden histories” of queer individuals in Denver, and the challenges associated with navigating the world as a gay person in hiding. 

"The Snake Pit" was located in the basement of the building now at the basement of The Steak Bar at 17th and Glenarm Place.
"The Snake Pit" was located in the basement of the building now at the basement of The Steak Bar at 17th and Glenarm Place.

James Kennelly

Queer Spaces in Denver 1870-1980

Description: A Fort Collins newspaper report on the grand jury of a trial and charge of a man, James Kennelly, for his “crimes against nature.” Not necessarily clear on the specific reasoning behind his charge, but context leads us to believe this was a crime related to homosexuality. Historically, “crimes against nature” have included homosexual acts. If true, he would’ve been the first person charged for homosexual crimes in Northern Colorado.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • How do historians often need to “read between the lines” to find instances of historical queerness? 

Significance: This source demonstrates an example of a common problem in gay history: it can be difficult to identify the exact cases of gay, trans, or otherwise non-heterosexual or non-cis people in the historical record. 

List of crimes committed in Fort Collins. At the bottom, James Kennelly is charged with "crimes against nature". 1890.
List of crimes committed in Fort Collins, 1890. Note: James Kennelly is charged with "crimes against nature."

Denver's "Stonewall"

Denver’s Stonewall – History Colorado

Description: In 1973, the Colorado Gay Coalition staged a protest at a Denver city council meeting in hopes of getting the anti-gay laws around public expression removed. Around 300 queer Coloradans attended the meeting and demanded to be heard. After some negotiation, they were allowed to speak their concerns about the laws. Still, it was made very clear that at any moment, Robert Koch, the head councilman, was willing to have the police come and arrest all of the Coalition members. The speakers spent 30 minutes detailing the discrimination they faced at the hands of the Denver government and police, as it was common practice to entrap and arrest queer Coloradans for little reason. The meeting was dubbed “Denver’s Stonewall” and was reported on as a revolt, although there was no violence, and the GCD peacefully advocated for the removal of the laws. The framing of this event was significant in that the reporting was twisted to make it seem like the GCD posed a threat to safety at the meeting. Many members felt the pressure of being outed, but the GCD was a place where queer people could find community and resources. Ultimately, “Denver’s Stonewall” was successful in overturning the laws and ending the police force’s targeted harassment.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • What is the significance of this meeting being called “Denver’s Stonewall?”

  • How are the events similar and how are they different? 

Significance: This source presents a public meeting and an example of queer visibility, something that can be difficult to locate in Denver and Colorado’s queer community.

The Gay and Lesbian Community Center’s inaugural board members at their Capitol Hill building in 1977.
The Gay and Lesbian Community Center’s inaugural board members at their Capitol Hill building, Denver, 1977 (History Colorado).
Activists attend a Denver City Council hearing about discrimination against the gay and lesbian community. The “gay revolt” becomes known as “Colorado’s Stonewall.”
"Colorado's Stonewall." Activists attend a Denver City Council hearing about discrimination against the gay and lesbian community, Denver, 1973 (History Colorado).

City Council Newspaper Articles, 1973

A Strange New Deal for Gays

Lewd, Wanton, and Lavicious

Butterflies and Wallflowers Discuss Sex

Description: This is a collection of 3 newspaper articles covering the 1973 City Council meeting pictured in the above resource. The articles were published by The Straight Creek Journal, an alternative Newspaper in Boulder Colorado. These articles describe the methods of entrapment used by the Denver Police to harass and arrest primarily gay men. The articles also give a comprehensive overview of the city council meeting. These articles show why and how LGBTQIA+ people fought for civil rights. This was a landmark moment in Northern Colorado Queer history, because it was successful in ending two decades of entrapment in Denver.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • What was the police response to the allegations of entrapment?

  • Was the city council willing to hear all 300 attendees? How did the meeting end up happening?

Significance: This source presents a public meeting and an example of queer visibility, something that can be difficult to locate in Denver and Colorado’s queer community.

The Straight Creek Journal, Volume II, Number 44, November 6, 1973
The Straight Creek Journal, November 6, 1973.

Shari Wilkens Oral History

Shari Wilkens Oral History

Description: This is an interview with Shari Wilkens, a lesbian educator and activist from Denver. In this oral history, she describes growing up in Park Hill during the Gay Civil Rights movement and the changes that she witnessed regarding the treatment of queer people over her lifetime. Shari was very involved in the movement and her work, among many others, contributed to the acceptance and normalization of queerness in Colorado. This account helps show the change that occurred in her lifetime regarding gay rights and provides context for the effects of the Lavender Scare and the subsequent gay rights movement in Denver.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • How does Shari describe being queer in Denver in the 1970s?
  • How did Shari work to make her neighborhood more accepting?

Significance: Her story teaches us many things, most importantly, sharing a sense of community and compassion.

 
Shari Wilkens as an adult
Shari Wilkens

"Dear Mrs. Mayfield..."

Dear Mrs. Mayfield Letter

Description: Newspaper except of a young man writing to an advice column, known by pen name Mrs. Mayfield, for advice on his “trouble” of identifying as queer and that he is sexually drawn to men. He also notes that Mrs. Mayfield would be “shocked at how many men here in Denver are this way (even married men)”. The writer’s asking for advice on his sexual feelings and identity is a rare glimpse into the personal struggles of queer people in the 1940s, in an era when many LGBTQ+ individuals hid their identities, this article shows how even mainstream media provided a space for people to question and express their desires, despite the prevailing social taboos.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • What do you feel when you read this letter?
  • How must this man have felt when he reached out for advice? 

Significance: This article shows how even mainstream media provided a space for people to question and express their desires, despite the prevailing social taboos. It helps the reader develop empathy for the crushing isolation many queer people felt before mainstream social acceptance and awareness of gay culture. 

 
The Rocky Mountain News, Volume 89, Number 152, May 31, 1948.
The Rocky Mountain News, May 31, 1948.

The Mattachine Society Flyer

The Mattachine Society

Description: This is the front page of the program for the 6th annual convention of the Mattachine Society in Denver in 1959. The Mattachine Society was a community for gay people to meet and discuss the issues they faced. In Denver, a chapter was founded in 1957, but was dissolved shortly after the conference was held in 1959 due to police attention. The Denver Police were heavily involved in perpetrating the Lavender Scare in Colorado, and surveillance from the FBI at the conference made being gay in Colorado very difficult and dangerous. Whether queer residents of the Northern Colorado region participated or attended the convention in unknown at this time. Participation in the convention was a risky undertaking, as evidenced by the fact that we now know the FBI surveilled and reported on the convention.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • What issues were gay men discussing at the conference? 

  • Why do you think the Denver Mattachine Society was dissolved?

Significance: This is significant because although there was public and legal pressure to hide queerness, gay people still found ways to connect and create community. This is also an example of the police’s effort to undermine gay spaces. 

 
The Mattachine Society's 6th Annual Convention program, 1959.
The Mattachine Society's 6th Annual Convention Program, Denver, 1959.

The Grove

Description: The Grove is a memorial located in Commons Park to Colorado victims of the AIDS epidemic of the 1980s and 1990s. It was dedicated as part of the wishes of Doug McNeil, a Denver realtor who died of AIDS in 1993. McNeil wanted a place in Denver where people could go and meditate on those whom they had lost. The park was dedicated in 2000, but was forgotten about shortly after and neglected. It was rededicated in 2016, but many are still unaware it exists.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • Why might the park have been neglected after its dedication?
  • What is the significance of rededicating the park in 2016? What had changed between 2000 and 2016? 
 
 
A plaque at "The Grove" Park.
"The Grove" Park, Denver, 2016.

The Advocate, 1993

Description: An image of the cover of The Advocate magazine from February 23, 1993, featuring the cover story “Colorado Goes Straight to Hell.” The articles detail the aftermath of the passage of Amendment 2 in the state, including an increase in anti-LGBT violence in the state. 

Amendment 2 was a ballot initiative passed by Colorado voters in 1992 that prohibited the state from enacting antidiscrimination protections for members of the LGBTQ+ community. This came in the wake of anti-discrimination laws passed by the cities of Denver, Boulder, and Aspen, which triggered conservative groups in the state to create and push to pass Amendment 2. In the 1992 election, Colorado voters approved the amendment by a 53–47 percent margin.

Possible Inquiry Questions:

  • Why would nationwide LGBT groups want to boycott Colorado?

Significance: In the aftermath of the AIDS crisis, Amendment 2 represented a significant setback for LGBT progress and public safety in Colorado. 

Cover of "The Advocate", February 1993, after Amendment 2 passed. Courtesy of the Queer Memeory Project.
Cover of "The Advocate", February 1993, after Amendment 2 passed. Courtesy of the Queer Memeory Project.